Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Biden Did EXACTLY What Trump Did, But One Is Being Protected And
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:05:40 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2024-10-16 19:40, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <veppde$2fj82$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-16 17:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vepka0$2eimk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-16 16:53, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-10-16, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Skeeter's correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
>>>>>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
>>>>>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
>>>>>>> where it says that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, I don't need to read it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
>>>>>> he wasn't EVER supposed to have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
>>>>>> take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
>>>>>> him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
>>>>>> place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
>>>>>> how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you seen him lately?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Biden is being protected and Trump is not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Case closed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Biden removed documents from the SCIF which is a huge violation.
>>>>> Biden was not POTUS when the massive number of documents were taken so
>>>>> he had no authority to posses them.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's that simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether Trump's authority permitted him to retain the documents he was
>>>>> in posession of is a matter of litigation but as POTUS at least he had
>>>>> the authority that Joe Biden did not have.
>>>> Hur dealt with that.
>>>
>>> By ignoring it.
>>
>> Nope. He went into great detail.
>>
>> You should read the report.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Biden had permission to bring documents to his home.
>>>
>>> Why did he need "permission" if he didn't know he had them?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He had permission WHEN they were taken home.
>>
>> Then they got overlooked.
> 
> But he said he didn't know he had them. Therefore he wouldn't need
> permission.

He didn't know he STILL had them at the time they were turned up.

They got to his home and office in only two ways:

1. He took them home at the time he DID have permission.

2. They were accidentally packed up and brought home when he left office.