Davin News Server

In article <verg54$2qcov$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-16 19:40, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <veppde$2fj82$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-16 17:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vepka0$2eimk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-16 16:53, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2024-10-16, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Skeeter's correct.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
> >>>>>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
> >>>>>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
> >>>>>>> where it says that:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then, I don't need to read it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
> >>>>>> he wasn't EVER supposed to have.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
> >>>>>> take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
> >>>>>> him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
> >>>>>> place.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
> >>>>>> how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Have you seen him lately?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Biden is being protected and Trump is not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Case closed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Biden removed documents from the SCIF which is a huge violation.
> >>>>> Biden was not POTUS when the massive number of documents were taken so
> >>>>> he had no authority to posses them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's that simple.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Whether Trump's authority permitted him to retain the documents he was
> >>>>> in posession of is a matter of litigation but as POTUS at least he had
> >>>>> the authority that Joe Biden did not have.
> >>>> Hur dealt with that.
> >>>
> >>> By ignoring it.
> >>
> >> Nope. He went into great detail.
> >>
> >> You should read the report.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Biden had permission to bring documents to his home.
> >>>
> >>> Why did he need "permission" if he didn't know he had them?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> He had permission WHEN they were taken home.
> >>
> >> Then they got overlooked.
> > 
> > But he said he didn't know he had them. Therefore he wouldn't need
> > permission.
> 
> He didn't know he STILL had them at the time they were turned up.

Where did he think they went?
> 
> They got to his home and office in only two ways:
> 
> 1. He took them home at the time he DID have permission.

But he said he didn't know he had them. No permission needed.
> 
> 2. They were accidentally packed up and brought home when he left office.

Not to responsible is it? Just allowing documents to be handled by just 
anyone.

Funny on the timing. Right after the Trump thing all of a sudden Joe has 
documents he needs to return. Documents he said he didn't realize he 
had.