Davin News Server

In article <veri4u$2rflo$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-17 10:19, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <verg54$2qcov$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-16 19:40, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <veppde$2fj82$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-16 17:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vepka0$2eimk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-16 16:53, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2024-10-16, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Skeeter's correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
> >>>>>>>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
> >>>>>>>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
> >>>>>>>>> where it says that:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Then, I don't need to read it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
> >>>>>>>> he wasn't EVER supposed to have.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
> >>>>>>>> take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
> >>>>>>>> him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
> >>>>>>>> place.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
> >>>>>>>> how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Have you seen him lately?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Biden is being protected and Trump is not.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Case closed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Biden removed documents from the SCIF which is a huge violation.
> >>>>>>> Biden was not POTUS when the massive number of documents were taken so
> >>>>>>> he had no authority to posses them.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's that simple.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Whether Trump's authority permitted him to retain the documents he was
> >>>>>>> in posession of is a matter of litigation but as POTUS at least he had
> >>>>>>> the authority that Joe Biden did not have.
> >>>>>> Hur dealt with that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> By ignoring it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope. He went into great detail.
> >>>>
> >>>> You should read the report.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Biden had permission to bring documents to his home.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why did he need "permission" if he didn't know he had them?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> He had permission WHEN they were taken home.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then they got overlooked.
> >>>
> >>> But he said he didn't know he had them. Therefore he wouldn't need
> >>> permission.
> >>
> >> He didn't know he STILL had them at the time they were turned up.
> > 
> > Where did he think they went?
> 
> He forgot about them.

So he is senile. You don't forget about classified documents.
> 
> >>
> >> They got to his home and office in only two ways:
> >>
> >> 1. He took them home at the time he DID have permission.
> > 
> > But he said he didn't know he had them. No permission needed.
> 
> But they came home when he DID need and have permission to have taken 
> them home.

But he said he didn't know he had them. So why would permission be 
needed?
> 
> >>
> >> 2. They were accidentally packed up and brought home when he left office.
> > 
> > Not to responsible is it? Just allowing documents to be handled by just
> > anyone.
> 
> Why do you imagine it was just "anyone"?

It wasn't him.
> 
> > 
> > Funny on the timing. Right after the Trump thing all of a sudden Joe has
> > documents he needs to return. Documents he said he didn't realize he
> > had.
> Because someone in his camp thought it would be a good idea to make 
> CERTAIN there wasn't anything that could be called out against him later.

Yea right. You really are this stupid.