Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Biden Did EXACTLY What Trump Did, But One Is Being Protected And The Other IS Not - Case Closed
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:17:00 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vert1k$2t54l$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-17 12:32, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <veri4u$2rflo$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-17 10:19, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <verg54$2qcov$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-16 19:40, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <veppde$2fj82$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-16 17:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vepka0$2eimk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-16 16:53, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-16, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter's correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
> >>>>>>>>>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
> >>>>>>>>>>> where it says that:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Then, I don't need to read it.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
> >>>>>>>>>> he wasn't EVER supposed to have.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
> >>>>>>>>>> take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
> >>>>>>>>>> him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
> >>>>>>>>>> place.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
> >>>>>>>>>> how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Have you seen him lately?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Biden is being protected and Trump is not.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Case closed.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Biden removed documents from the SCIF which is a huge violation.
> >>>>>>>>> Biden was not POTUS when the massive number of documents were taken so
> >>>>>>>>> he had no authority to posses them.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It's that simple.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Whether Trump's authority permitted him to retain the documents he was
> >>>>>>>>> in posession of is a matter of litigation but as POTUS at least he had
> >>>>>>>>> the authority that Joe Biden did not have.
> >>>>>>>> Hur dealt with that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> By ignoring it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. He went into great detail.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You should read the report.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Biden had permission to bring documents to his home.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why did he need "permission" if he didn't know he had them?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He had permission WHEN they were taken home.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then they got overlooked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But he said he didn't know he had them. Therefore he wouldn't need
> >>>>> permission.
> >>>>
> >>>> He didn't know he STILL had them at the time they were turned up.
> >>>
> >>> Where did he think they went?
> >>
> >> He forgot about them.
> > 
> > So he is senile. You don't forget about classified documents.
> 
> When you're someone who works with so many of them?

They have a place. They shouldn't be just lying around.
> 
> Of course you do.

I had a classified status in the military. Even then we didn't just 
leave paperwork lying around.
> 
> People get inured to things they do all the time.
> 
> Robert Hur said as much in his report.
> 
> You should read it.

I did and Joe lied when he said he didn't know he had them.
> 
> :-)
> 
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> They got to his home and office in only two ways:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. He took them home at the time he DID have permission.
> >>>
> >>> But he said he didn't know he had them. No permission needed.
> >>
> >> But they came home when he DID need and have permission to have taken
> >> them home.
> > 
> > But he said he didn't know he had them. So why would permission be
> > needed?
> 
> Asked and answered.
> 
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. They were accidentally packed up and brought home when he left office.
> >>>
> >>> Not to responsible is it? Just allowing documents to be handled by just
> >>> anyone.
> >>
> >> Why do you imagine it was just "anyone"?
> > 
> > It wasn't him.
> 
> That doesn't make it just "anyone".
> 
> Trusted aides with security clearances would have done it.
> 
> And before you say it, that doesn't mean they would have read everything 
> they were boxing up for transport.
> 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Funny on the timing. Right after the Trump thing all of a sudden Joe has
> >>> documents he needs to return. Documents he said he didn't realize he
> >>> had.
> >> Because someone in his camp thought it would be a good idea to make
> >> CERTAIN there wasn't anything that could be called out against him later.
> > 
> > Yea right. You really are this stupid.
> 
> Of course you would.