From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: "Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:38:52 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:07:48 -0700, Alan says...
> Page 1:
>
> 'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
> evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> Page 4:
>
> 'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
> would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> 'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> Page 200:
>
> 'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
> Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> Page 203:
>
> 'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
> strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> Page 204:
>
> 'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
> OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
> Page 220:
>
> 'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
> the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
THAT is a SPECIFIC "document", you fucking moron, not all as a whole.
> Page 227:
>
> 'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
> beyond a reasonable doubt.'
"Reasonable Doubt", Does NOT Mean Someone's Innocent
=====
Joe Biden: Pedophile
https://youtu.be/zipl1G_1zJs