Davin News Server

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 12:39:08 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On 2024-10-18 19:33, AlleyCat wrote:
> > 
> > Because Trump was right and they knew it and they wanted the attention taken
> > off their cheating, which THEY said WE'D do, but found out it could be done.
> 
> Then why did none of the lawsuits succeed?

Because they either cheated in ways that can't be proven, or, more likely, the system is run by people who are against Trump and will 
"cheat" themselves, to deny the truth getting out.

Trump's legal team was met with denials over EVERY aspect of the lawsuits, many times not even being allowed to present evidence, because 
it didn't meet some almost arbitrary condition.

I can't believe you think that all cheaters get caught.

If it was somehow out of the realm of possibilities that the Democrats took advantage of election laws and conditions, then WHY were the 
Democrats telling us Trump possibly cheated using the same tactics I'm accusing THEM of using?

=====

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1847287765853188096/vid/avc1/788x438/8cCOrPy5--r9fH5b.mp4?tag=16

"I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol where 
we brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that 
are not, those that are being used in many states." - Kamala Harris

"Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and 
other voting systems are susceptible to tampering."

Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to 
breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.

In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for 
certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another.

The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates 
cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software which 
would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. 

These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.

You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are 
doing different things, but in fact three companies are controlling that.

It is the individual voting machines that some pose some of the greatest 
risks. 

There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right?... 
which are vulnerable to being hacked.

Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was 
possible to switch votes.

Forty-three percent of American voters use voting MACHINES, that researchers 
have found have serious security flaws, including back-doors.

We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know, I know, that hackathon 
that took place last year where virtually every machine was broken into fairly 
quickly.

I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol where we 
brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that 
are not, those that are being used in many states.

Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software like Windows XP in 
2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more 
vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack.

In a close present re-election, they just need to hack one swing state, or 
maybe one or two, or maybe just a few counties in one swing state.

I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You 
have 21 states that were hacked into, they didn't find out about it for a 
year.

Right now we have over a dozen states that either don't have any backup paper 
ballots or only have them partially. Do you think that our adversaries don't 
know what those states are? Of course they know what those states are. And if 
we have a close election, and the general election, in a presidential race, 
and one state's out with standing, and their ballot boxes get hacked into, 
their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup.

I know America's voting machines are vulnerable, because my colleagues and I 
have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from 
machine to machine...