From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Why Did The Democrats Start Calling Everyone Who Questioned The 2020 Election, Conspiracy Nuts?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 15:29:57 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfe3nn$2oc4e$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-24 11:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:02:59 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >> Literally none of what you wrote addresses your claim that lawsuits were improperly dismissed.
> >
> > I'll remember that little passage next time you don't refute something and whine about links you're too stupid to follow.
> Your claim was:
>
> 'Trump's legal team was met with denials over EVERY aspect of the
> lawsuits, many times not even being allowed to present evidence, because
> it didn't meet some almost arbitrary condition.'
>
> Show us a single lawsuit where they were prevented from presenting
> evidence and if that's the case, I'll show you why.
>
> In at least one very notable case, when asked if they had actual
> evidence of voting fraud, Trump's minions had to admit they didn't.
Still no job to go to?