Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Many People Do You Personally Know Who Have Died Mysteriously? How About In Plane Crashes Or Car Wrecks? Bizarre Suicides? - Joe Biden Is Being Protected - He IS Cogent Enough To Stand Trial
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:22:19 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vfk440$3ul20$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-26 17:21, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfjthm$3tldt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-17 20:52, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:36:29 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>>> Tell us the law, where Biden was allowed to have documents when he was neither VP NOR President, but Trump wasn't, when
> >>>>> HE was no longer President.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tell us the law that allowed Trump to do the same.
> >>>
> >>> But but but Trrrrummmmmp!
> >>>
> >>> This is NOT about Trump, and whatever Trump did, does NOT exonerate Biden, you pansy-ass pussy, invoking Trummmmp!
> >>>
> >>> "I need to go back and make sure that I take note of a word that you used, 'exoneration,'" Hur said. "That is not a
> >>> word that is used in my report and that is not a part of my task as a prosecutor."
> >>>
> >>> "I did not exonerate him," Hur said. "That word does not appear in the report."
> >>>
> >>> "It's clear from Hur's sweeping 388-page report THAT HE DID NOT COMPLETELY EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT, as Nadler claimed
> >>> Tuesday."
> >>>
> >>> Not completely exonerated, means he broke the law.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> "Innocent until proven guilty": heard of it?
> > 
> > Unless it's Trump right?
> 
> Nope.
> 
> But Trump was investigated, evidence was presented to a grand jury and 
> an indictment was returned?

Was that a question?
> 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hur found evidence that Biden WILLFULLY RETAINED CLASSIFIED MATERIALS AFTER HE LEFT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE. He also
> >>> uncovered some examples of Biden SHARING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION with his book author.
> >> And Trump deliberately wilfully took (and retained when requested to
> >> return) far, FAR more classified documents.
> >>
> >> So why the double standard?
> > 
> > So since Trump did it that makes it ok for Joe? So Joe approves of what
> > Trump did.
> They didn't do the same thing.

Nope. Joe is guilty and you know it. He wasn't supposed to have them 
period.
> 
> "mens rea": look it up.

No.