From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Why Did The Democrats Start Calling Everyone Who Questioned The 2020 Election, Conspiracy Nuts?
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:25:20 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfk3u0$3ul21$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-26 17:22, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfjvfc$3tldt$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-24 14:29, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfe3nn$2oc4e$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-24 11:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:02:59 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Literally none of what you wrote addresses your claim that lawsuits were improperly dismissed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll remember that little passage next time you don't refute something and whine about links you're too stupid to follow.
> >>>> Your claim was:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'Trump's legal team was met with denials over EVERY aspect of the
> >>>> lawsuits, many times not even being allowed to present evidence, because
> >>>> it didn't meet some almost arbitrary condition.'
> >>>>
> >>>> Show us a single lawsuit where they were prevented from presenting
> >>>> evidence and if that's the case, I'll show you why.
> >>>>
> >>>> In at least one very notable case, when asked if they had actual
> >>>> evidence of voting fraud, Trump's minions had to admit they didn't.
> >>>
> >>> Still no job to go to?
> >>
> >> Says the guy replying at 14:29 PDT...
> >
> > Who cares? I'm retired.
>
> So you say...
I sure do. Have been for a while youngster. Maybe if you work hard you
can too. But if Harris wins don't count on it.