From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Why Did The Democrats Start Calling Everyone Who Questioned The 2020 Election, Conspiracy Nuts?
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:50:17 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-26 18:25, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfk3u0$3ul21$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-26 17:22, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfjvfc$3tldt$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-24 14:29, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfe3nn$2oc4e$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-24 11:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:02:59 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Literally none of what you wrote addresses your claim that lawsuits were improperly dismissed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll remember that little passage next time you don't refute something and whine about links you're too stupid to follow.
>>>>>> Your claim was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Trump's legal team was met with denials over EVERY aspect of the
>>>>>> lawsuits, many times not even being allowed to present evidence, because
>>>>>> it didn't meet some almost arbitrary condition.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show us a single lawsuit where they were prevented from presenting
>>>>>> evidence and if that's the case, I'll show you why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In at least one very notable case, when asked if they had actual
>>>>>> evidence of voting fraud, Trump's minions had to admit they didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still no job to go to?
>>>>
>>>> Says the guy replying at 14:29 PDT...
>>>
>>> Who cares? I'm retired.
>>
>> So you say...
>
> I sure do. Have been for a while youngster. Maybe if you work hard you
> can too. But if Harris wins don't count on it.
Won't make a difference to me either way.
Honestly, I wish there was a way for all you cultists to get your wish
without having everyone else in your country suffer the consequences.