From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Many People Do You Personally Know Who Have Died
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:52:31 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-26 18:22, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfk440$3ul20$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-26 17:21, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfjthm$3tldt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-17 20:52, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:36:29 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell us the law, where Biden was allowed to have documents when he was neither VP NOR President, but Trump wasn't, when
>>>>>>> HE was no longer President.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell us the law that allowed Trump to do the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> But but but Trrrrummmmmp!
>>>>>
>>>>> This is NOT about Trump, and whatever Trump did, does NOT exonerate Biden, you pansy-ass pussy, invoking Trummmmp!
>>>>>
>>>>> "I need to go back and make sure that I take note of a word that you used, 'exoneration,'" Hur said. "That is not a
>>>>> word that is used in my report and that is not a part of my task as a prosecutor."
>>>>>
>>>>> "I did not exonerate him," Hur said. "That word does not appear in the report."
>>>>>
>>>>> "It's clear from Hur's sweeping 388-page report THAT HE DID NOT COMPLETELY EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT, as Nadler claimed
>>>>> Tuesday."
>>>>>
>>>>> Not completely exonerated, means he broke the law.
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> "Innocent until proven guilty": heard of it?
>>>
>>> Unless it's Trump right?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> But Trump was investigated, evidence was presented to a grand jury and
>> an indictment was returned?
>
> Was that a question?
Nope. Just a typo.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hur found evidence that Biden WILLFULLY RETAINED CLASSIFIED MATERIALS AFTER HE LEFT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE. He also
>>>>> uncovered some examples of Biden SHARING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION with his book author.
>>>> And Trump deliberately wilfully took (and retained when requested to
>>>> return) far, FAR more classified documents.
>>>>
>>>> So why the double standard?
>>>
>>> So since Trump did it that makes it ok for Joe? So Joe approves of what
>>> Trump did.
>> They didn't do the same thing.
>
> Nope. Joe is guilty and you know it. He wasn't supposed to have them
> period.
But then Trump "wasn't supposed to have them, period"...
...and he did it DELIBERATELY.
>>
>> "mens rea": look it up.
>
> No.
I'll help:
'mens rea | Ëmenz ËrÄÉ |
noun Law
the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a
crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. Compare with
actus reus: a mistaken belief in consent meant that the defendant lacked
mens rea.'