From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Many People Do You Personally Know Who Have Died
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 16:03:13 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-27 05:09, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfk6d0$3ut1t$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-26 18:22, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfk440$3ul20$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-26 17:21, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfjthm$3tldt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-17 20:52, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:36:29 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tell us the law, where Biden was allowed to have documents when he was neither VP NOR President, but Trump wasn't, when
>>>>>>>>> HE was no longer President.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell us the law that allowed Trump to do the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But but but Trrrrummmmmp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is NOT about Trump, and whatever Trump did, does NOT exonerate Biden, you pansy-ass pussy, invoking Trummmmp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I need to go back and make sure that I take note of a word that you used, 'exoneration,'" Hur said. "That is not a
>>>>>>> word that is used in my report and that is not a part of my task as a prosecutor."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I did not exonerate him," Hur said. "That word does not appear in the report."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "It's clear from Hur's sweeping 388-page report THAT HE DID NOT COMPLETELY EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT, as Nadler claimed
>>>>>>> Tuesday."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not completely exonerated, means he broke the law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Innocent until proven guilty": heard of it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless it's Trump right?
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> But Trump was investigated, evidence was presented to a grand jury and
>>>> an indictment was returned?
>>>
>>> Was that a question?
>>
>> Nope. Just a typo.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hur found evidence that Biden WILLFULLY RETAINED CLASSIFIED MATERIALS AFTER HE LEFT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE. He also
>>>>>>> uncovered some examples of Biden SHARING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION with his book author.
>>>>>> And Trump deliberately wilfully took (and retained when requested to
>>>>>> return) far, FAR more classified documents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So why the double standard?
>>>>>
>>>>> So since Trump did it that makes it ok for Joe? So Joe approves of what
>>>>> Trump did.
>>>> They didn't do the same thing.
>>>
>>> Nope. Joe is guilty and you know it. He wasn't supposed to have them
>>> period.
>>
>> But then Trump "wasn't supposed to have them, period"...
>>
>> ...and he did it DELIBERATELY.
>>
>>>>
>>>> "mens rea": look it up.
>>>
>>> No.
>> I'll help:
>>
>> 'mens rea | ?menz 're? |
>>
>> noun Law
>>
>> the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a
>> crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. Compare with
>> actus reus: a mistaken belief in consent meant that the defendant lacked
>> mens rea.'
>
> So Joe is just as guilty.
Nope.
Accidental is different that deliberate.