From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 17:46:38 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
> >
> >> Utterly false.
> >
> > So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
> >
> > blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
> >
> >> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
> >> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
> >> it.
> >
> > So?
> >
> > Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
> > acceptable.
>
> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> the Clintons.
She still sold it to Russia.
>
> >
> > I'm so flattered that you take the time out of your busy schedule to
> > TRY to debunk what OTHER people write.
>
> I think bullshit should be called out for what it is.