From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Many People Do You Personally Know Who Have Died
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:04:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-27 16:49, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfmgri$k60r$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-27 05:09, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfk6d0$3ut1t$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-26 18:22, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfk440$3ul20$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 17:21, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfjthm$3tldt$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17 20:52, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:36:29 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us the law, where Biden was allowed to have documents when he was neither VP NOR President, but Trump wasn't, when
>>>>>>>>>>> HE was no longer President.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tell us the law that allowed Trump to do the same.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But but but Trrrrummmmmp!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is NOT about Trump, and whatever Trump did, does NOT exonerate Biden, you pansy-ass pussy, invoking Trummmmp!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I need to go back and make sure that I take note of a word that you used, 'exoneration,'" Hur said. "That is not a
>>>>>>>>> word that is used in my report and that is not a part of my task as a prosecutor."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I did not exonerate him," Hur said. "That word does not appear in the report."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "It's clear from Hur's sweeping 388-page report THAT HE DID NOT COMPLETELY EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT, as Nadler claimed
>>>>>>>>> Tuesday."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not completely exonerated, means he broke the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Innocent until proven guilty": heard of it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unless it's Trump right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But Trump was investigated, evidence was presented to a grand jury and
>>>>>> an indictment was returned?
>>>>>
>>>>> Was that a question?
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Just a typo.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hur found evidence that Biden WILLFULLY RETAINED CLASSIFIED MATERIALS AFTER HE LEFT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE. He also
>>>>>>>>> uncovered some examples of Biden SHARING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION with his book author.
>>>>>>>> And Trump deliberately wilfully took (and retained when requested to
>>>>>>>> return) far, FAR more classified documents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So why the double standard?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So since Trump did it that makes it ok for Joe? So Joe approves of what
>>>>>>> Trump did.
>>>>>> They didn't do the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Joe is guilty and you know it. He wasn't supposed to have them
>>>>> period.
>>>>
>>>> But then Trump "wasn't supposed to have them, period"...
>>>>
>>>> ...and he did it DELIBERATELY.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "mens rea": look it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>> I'll help:
>>>>
>>>> 'mens rea | ?menz 're? |
>>>>
>>>> noun Law
>>>>
>>>> the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a
>>>> crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. Compare with
>>>> actus reus: a mistaken belief in consent meant that the defendant lacked
>>>> mens rea.'
>>>
>>> So Joe is just as guilty.
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> Accidental is different that deliberate.
>
> You don't "accidentally" take classified documents. Joe was wrong and
> protected.
Sure you do.
Things happen by accident all the time and he worked with classified
documents for YEARS.
Trump took the DELIBERATELY.
A fact so obvious, you don't even try to deny it.