From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:07:04 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-27 16:41, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfmg9i$k60r$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-27 04:59, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfkp2n$5dht$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:54:42 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>> '?The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ?raped?
>>>>>> within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she
>>>>>> failed to prove that Mr. Trump ?raped? her as many people commonly
>>>>>> understand the word ?rape,? ? Kaplan wrote.'
>>>>>
>>>>> So, it was a guess.
>>>>
>>>> What in there says it was a guess?
>>>
>>> No rape. Look at the court records. The opinion of a crooked judge does
>>> not make a case.
>>
>> And him not agreeing with you doesn't make him crooked.
>
> He doesn't get to have an opinion. There was no rape. This is settled.
There was digital penetration of her vagina.
The judge just clarified that most people call that rape.