From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:50:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
>>>>>
>>>>>> Utterly false.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
>>>>>
>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>>
>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
>>>>> acceptable.
>>>>
>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>> the Clintons.
>>>
>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>
>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>
> "last to leave the room"
>
> She still approved it.
Yes.
So what?
Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.