From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:19:19 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Utterly false.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
> >>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
> >>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
> >>>>>>> acceptable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>
> >>> "last to leave the room"
> >>>
> >>> She still approved it.
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> So what?
> >>
> >> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
> >>
> >> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
> >
> > Bullshit.
>
> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
> back up:
>
> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
> among some Fox viewers.
>
> ...
>
> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
> took them apart.
>
> ...
>
> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
> administration. ...
>
> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
> company was exported to Russia'
>
> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?