From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:41:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
>>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
>>>>>>>>> acceptable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>
>>>>> "last to leave the room"
>>>>>
>>>>> She still approved it.
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
>>>>
>>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>
>> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
>> back up:
>>
>> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
>> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
>> among some Fox viewers.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
>> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
>> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
>> took them apart.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
>> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
>> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
>> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
>> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
>> administration. ...
>>
>> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
>> company was exported to Russia'
>>
>> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
>
> Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
"Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
But if that's not enough for you:
'November 24, 2010
NRCâs [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
<https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
And while were at it:
'We donât even know if Clinton was involved in the committeeâs review
and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
department on the committee. âMrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
any C.F.I.U.S. matter,â he told the Times, referring to the committee by
its acronym.'