From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:13:44 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
> >>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
> >>>
> >>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
> >> allow the sale to proceed.
> >>
> >> None.
> >
> > She was. This is settled.
>
> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
>
> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> its acronym.'
How do I know they aren't lying?