From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:12:24 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfp0do$1538g$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
> >>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
> >>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
> >>>>>>>>> acceptable.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "last to leave the room"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> She still approved it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>> So what?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
> >>>>
> >>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
> >>>
> >>> Bullshit.
> >>
> >> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
> >> back up:
> >>
> >> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
> >> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
> >> among some Fox viewers.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
> >> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
> >> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
> >> took them apart.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
> >> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
> >> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
> >> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
> >> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
> >> administration. ...
> >>
> >> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
> >> company was exported to Russia'
> >>
> >> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
> >
> > Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
>
> "Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
>
> This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
>
> But if that's not enough for you:
What makes you think I watch Fox?
>
>
> 'November 24, 2010
>
> NRC?s [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
> control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
> licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
> operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
> procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
> danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
> licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
> decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
> export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
>
> <https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
>
> And while were at it:
Why bother? I won't be reading your bull.
>
> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> its acronym.'