From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:24:12 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
>>>>>
>>>>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
>>>>
>>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>>> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
>>>> allow the sale to proceed.
>>>>
>>>> None.
>>>
>>> She was. This is settled.
>>
>> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
>>
>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
>> its acronym.'
>
> How do I know they aren't lying?
You have absolutely no evidence to present to counter it.