From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:24:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:12, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp0do$1538g$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
>>>>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
>>>>>>>>>>> acceptable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "last to leave the room"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She still approved it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
>>>> back up:
>>>>
>>>> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
>>>> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
>>>> among some Fox viewers.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
>>>> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
>>>> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
>>>> took them apart.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
>>>> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
>>>> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
>>>> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
>>>> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
>>>> administration. ...
>>>>
>>>> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
>>>> company was exported to Russia'
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
>>>
>>> Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
>>
>> "Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
>>
>> This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
>>
>> But if that's not enough for you:
>
> What makes you think I watch Fox?
>>
>>
>> 'November 24, 2010
>>
>> NRC?s [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
>> control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
>> licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
>> operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
>> procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
>> danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
>> licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
>> decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
>> export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
>>
>> <https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
>>
>> And while were at it:
>
> Why bother? I won't be reading your bull.
Good little cultist!
>>
>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
>> its acronym.'
>
>