Davin News Server

In article <vfp2v1$16ouv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-28 15:12, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfp0do$1538g$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
> >>>>>>>>>>> acceptable.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "last to leave the room"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She still approved it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So what?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>
> >>>> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
> >>>> back up:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
> >>>> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
> >>>> among some Fox viewers.
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
> >>>> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
> >>>> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
> >>>> took them apart.
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
> >>>> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
> >>>> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
> >>>> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
> >>>> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
> >>>> administration. ...
> >>>>
> >>>> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
> >>>> company was exported to Russia'
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
> >>>
> >>> Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
> >>
> >> "Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
> >>
> >> This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
> >>
> >> But if that's not enough for you:
> > 
> > What makes you think I watch Fox?
> >>
> >>
> >> 'November 24, 2010
> >>
> >> NRC?s [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
> >> control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
> >> licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
> >> operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
> >> procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
> >> danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
> >> licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
> >> decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
> >> export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
> >>
> >> <https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
> >>
> >> And while were at it:
> > 
> > Why bother? I won't be reading your bull.
> 
> Good little cultist!

Does that make you feel cool? You can call me a Boomer to and it would 
have the same effect. But do keep trying.
> 
> >>
> >> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> >> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> >> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> >> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> >> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> >> its acronym.'
> > 
> >