From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:36:42 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp2uc$16ouv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
>>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
>>>>>> allow the sale to proceed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None.
>>>>>
>>>>> She was. This is settled.
>>>>
>>>> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
>>>>
>>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
>>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
>>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
>>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
>>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
>>>> its acronym.'
>>>
>>> How do I know they aren't lying?
>>
>> You have absolutely no evidence to present to counter it.
>
> Don't need it. I know what I want to know.
How can you "know what [you] want to know"...
...without evidence?