From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:37:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp2v1$16ouv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 15:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfp0do$1538g$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> acceptable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "last to leave the room"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She still approved it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
>>>>>> back up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
>>>>>> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
>>>>>> among some Fox viewers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
>>>>>> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
>>>>>> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
>>>>>> took them apart.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
>>>>>> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
>>>>>> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
>>>>>> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
>>>>>> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
>>>>>> administration. ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
>>>>>> company was exported to Russia'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
>>>>>
>>>>> Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
>>>>
>>>> "Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
>>>>
>>>> This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
>>>>
>>>> But if that's not enough for you:
>>>
>>> What makes you think I watch Fox?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 'November 24, 2010
>>>>
>>>> NRC?s [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
>>>> control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
>>>> licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
>>>> operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
>>>> procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
>>>> danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
>>>> licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
>>>> decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
>>>> export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
>>>>
>>>> <https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
>>>>
>>>> And while were at it:
>>>
>>> Why bother? I won't be reading your bull.
>>
>> Good little cultist!
>
> Does that make you feel cool? You can call me a Boomer to and it would
> have the same effect. But do keep trying.
Thanks, little cultist!
I will.
:-)
>>
>>>>
>>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
>>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
>>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
>>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
>>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
>>>> its acronym.'
>>>
>>>
>
>