From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: And The Cheating Goes On
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:39:24 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:37, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp3bt$16ouv$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfovcn$15729$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfopc2$1538g$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 12:32, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfoj14$13oom$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 10:39, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vfohg2$13dv4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:07:39 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A bought jury.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Got any proof of that beyond you not agree with their verdict?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Got any proof that Trump committed rape, beyond that you agree with their verdict, because of your TDS?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I haven't looked into it that deeply.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What I know is that a suit was brought, and Trump had the opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>> put on a defence...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...and he lost.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But no rape charges.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The statute of limitations prevented it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But he was found by a jury to have committed what is called "rape" by
>>>>>>>> ordinary language.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. No rape happened. You poor gullible fool. Why did NYC change the
>>>>>>> statute of limitations to convict him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes they did.
>>>>
>>>> Cite that change please.
>>>>
>>> They did. This is settled. Rudy said so.
>>
>> So cite it.
>
> Rudy said it. Tell him to cite it.
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A jury found him LIABLE for rape in a CIVIL action.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Rape is not a civil crime.
>>>> There are not civil CRIMES, doofus.
>>>
>>> Then rape wouldn't be charged in a civil trial.
>>
>> You're wrong.
>>
> You are. Rape is not a civil matter.
>
>> You can be sued civilly for things you've actually been found not guilty
>> of in a criminal trial.
>
> Yea so? Do you feel that's right?
>>
>>>>
>>>> There are civil TORTS:
>>>>
>>>> 'tort | tôrt |
>>>>
>>>> noun Law
>>>>
>>>> a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract)
>>>> leading to civil legal liability:'
>>>
>>> Still no rape. No arrest, no jail. No rape.
>>
>> Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
>
> Nope. Show me where he got arrested for rape. When was he in jail for
> rape? I'll wait cupcake.
Show me where one has to be arrested in order to be found liable for
tort, cultist!
:-)