From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: And The Cheating Goes On
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:49:56 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfp3qs$16ogf$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-28 15:37, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfp3bt$16ouv$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 14:54, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfovcn$15729$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 13:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfopc2$1538g$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-28 12:32, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfoj14$13oom$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 10:39, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vfohg2$13dv4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:07:39 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A bought jury.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Got any proof of that beyond you not agree with their verdict?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Got any proof that Trump committed rape, beyond that you agree with their verdict, because of your TDS?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I haven't looked into it that deeply.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What I know is that a suit was brought, and Trump had the opportunity to
> >>>>>>>>>> put on a defence...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...and he lost.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But no rape charges.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Correct.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The statute of limitations prevented it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But he was found by a jury to have committed what is called "rape" by
> >>>>>>>> ordinary language.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nope. No rape happened. You poor gullible fool. Why did NYC change the
> >>>>>>> statute of limitations to convict him?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They didn't.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes they did.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cite that change please.
> >>>>
> >>> They did. This is settled. Rudy said so.
> >>
> >> So cite it.
> >
> > Rudy said it. Tell him to cite it.
> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A jury found him LIABLE for rape in a CIVIL action.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nope. Rape is not a civil crime.
> >>>> There are not civil CRIMES, doofus.
> >>>
> >>> Then rape wouldn't be charged in a civil trial.
> >>
> >> You're wrong.
> >>
> > You are. Rape is not a civil matter.
> >
> >> You can be sued civilly for things you've actually been found not guilty
> >> of in a criminal trial.
> >
> > Yea so? Do you feel that's right?
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> There are civil TORTS:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'tort | tôrt |
> >>>>
> >>>> noun Law
> >>>>
> >>>> a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract)
> >>>> leading to civil legal liability:'
> >>>
> >>> Still no rape. No arrest, no jail. No rape.
> >>
> >> Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
> >
> > Nope. Show me where he got arrested for rape. When was he in jail for
> > rape? I'll wait cupcake.
> Show me where one has to be arrested in order to be found liable for
> tort, cultist!
>
> :-)
It's rape and if you get accused of rape you get arrested. Simple huh?