Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:50:47 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vfp3lq$16ouv$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfp2uc$16ouv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
> >>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
> >>>>>> allow the sale to proceed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> None.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> She was. This is settled.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> >>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> >>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> >>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> >>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> >>>> its acronym.'
> >>>
> >>> How do I know they aren't lying?
> >>
> >> You have absolutely no evidence to present to counter it.
> > 
> > Don't need it. I know what I want to know.
> 
> How can you "know what [you] want to know"...
> 
> ...without evidence?

It's not hard. Try it sometime. Don't let others tell you how to think.