Davin News Server

In article <vfp3mj$16ouv$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfp2v1$16ouv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 15:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfp0do$1538g$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 14:19, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfou3g$1538g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfoptt$15729$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vfmriv$meop$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vfmh3l$k5vo$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-26 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:08:32 -0700,  Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Utterly false.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, the New York Times let's in articles that are "utterly false"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> blob:https://imgur.com/08f199ac-ca75-4fe8-9457-b66ed3796d9c
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frank Giustra made his donations to the Clinton Foundation and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sold his interest in Uranium One 3 years before Rosatom purchased
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Show us what that means, even what it means to you will be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> acceptable.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "last to leave the room"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She still approved it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So what?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Do you know what that sale didn't approve:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The sale of any actual URANIUM to Russia.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Loser, when are you going to learn that /I/ don't write things I can't
> >>>>>> back up:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'Fox News anchor Shepard Smith on Tuesday evening debunked what his own
> >>>>>> network has called the Hillary Clinton uranium scandal, sparking fury
> >>>>>> among some Fox viewers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In a lengthy and complex segment, Shepard Smith outlined the original
> >>>>>> accusations, made in a book by a journalist for rightwing news website
> >>>>>> Breitbart, and Trump?s using them to boost support on the campaign, and
> >>>>>> took them apart.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ?That statement is inaccurate in a number of ways,? Smith said. He then
> >>>>>> went on to describe how the deal needed the approval of a committee
> >>>>>> formed from the heads of nine federal government agencies, and Barack
> >>>>>> Obama ? because of the national security implications of Russia holding
> >>>>>> any US uranium interests ? under rules written during the Ronald Reagan
> >>>>>> administration. ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He added that none of the uranium mined in Wyoming by the Canadian
> >>>>>> company was exported to Russia'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/15/fox-news-anchor-debunks-networks-clinton-uranium-scandal-sparking-fury>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Play on words. You believe everything these losers tell you?
> >>>>
> >>>> "Play on words" what does that even mean in this context?
> >>>>
> >>>> This was your beloved Fox News speaking.
> >>>>
> >>>> But if that's not enough for you:
> >>>
> >>> What makes you think I watch Fox?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 'November 24, 2010
> >>>>
> >>>> NRC?s [Nuclear Regulatory Commission's] review of the transfer of
> >>>> control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will remain the
> >>>> licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery
> >>>> operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and
> >>>> procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize
> >>>> danger to life or property. The review also determined that the
> >>>> licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual
> >>>> decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC
> >>>> export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.'
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/view?AccessionNumber=ML103300018>
> >>>>
> >>>> And while were at it:
> >>>
> >>> Why bother? I won't be reading your bull.
> >>
> >> Good little cultist!
> > 
> > Does that make you feel cool? You can call me a Boomer to and it would
> > have the same effect. But do keep trying.
> 
> Thanks, little cultist!

Another rerun.
> 
> I will.
> 
> :-)
> 
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> >>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> >>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> >>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> >>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> >>>> its acronym.'
> >>>
> >>>
> > 
> >