From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:55:51 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-28 15:50, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vfp3lq$16ouv$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vfp2uc$16ouv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-28 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
>>>>>>>> allow the sale to proceed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> None.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> She was. This is settled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
>>>>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
>>>>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
>>>>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
>>>>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
>>>>>> its acronym.'
>>>>>
>>>>> How do I know they aren't lying?
>>>>
>>>> You have absolutely no evidence to present to counter it.
>>>
>>> Don't need it. I know what I want to know.
>>
>> How can you "know what [you] want to know"...
>>
>> ...without evidence?
>
> It's not hard. Try it sometime. Don't let others tell you how to think.
So you admit you're deciding what you know without evidence.
Got it.
You're a cultist and that's what cultists do!