From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton = Putin's Conduit To Hillary Clinton
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:09:04 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfp4po$171q0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-28 15:50, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfp3lq$16ouv$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 15:32, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vfp2uc$16ouv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-28 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vfp1ih$16efs$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-28 14:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vfov9s$1538g$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-28 13:16, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vfopso$15729$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-27 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:06:23 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It means that the person who donated the money had no motive to bribe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Clintons.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> She still sold it to Russia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. She was one of a committee of EIGHT.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ohhhh... because she schemed and scammed in a group to do what "they" did, that makes her innocent?
> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that that's what happened, Pussey?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She was involved and that's all that matters.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is no actual evidence that she was involved in the decision to
> >>>>>>>> allow the sale to proceed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> None.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She was. This is settled.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then you'll easily be able to support that claim:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'We don?t even know if Clinton was involved in the committee?s review
> >>>>>> and approval of the uranium deal. Jose Fernandez, a former assistant
> >>>>>> secretary of state, told the New York Times that he represented the
> >>>>>> department on the committee. ?Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on
> >>>>>> any C.F.I.U.S. matter,? he told the Times, referring to the committee by
> >>>>>> its acronym.'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do I know they aren't lying?
> >>>>
> >>>> You have absolutely no evidence to present to counter it.
> >>>
> >>> Don't need it. I know what I want to know.
> >>
> >> How can you "know what [you] want to know"...
> >>
> >> ...without evidence?
> >
> > It's not hard. Try it sometime. Don't let others tell you how to think.
>
> So you admit you're deciding what you know without evidence.
>
> Got it.
>
> You're a cultist and that's what cultists do!
I made you rerun twice.