Davin News Server

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:21:14 -0700,  Alan says...  

> > No life huh?
> 
> Plenty of life... ...I just like to argue and prefer to do it with 
> people I don't care about!

There's a difference in "arguing" and obsession. I bet you've tried to look everyone here up on the Internet, so the narcissist in you 
thinks he might have something on those you can find, therefore having an advantage on them, like you did when you stalked muahman. (see 
below)

This is Ski Bunny's M.O.:

The Liberal Argument Outline 

1. The Personal Attack:

Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER GIVE ANY HINT OF PERSONAL INFORMATION. Even something as innocuous 
as "I am a chef". 

They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention from the original lost argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts 
NEVER TO BE REFUTED. 

2. Name Calling:

Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more insight into 
your personal side. Then they will return to step 1. Ignore this. 

3. Use spun facts:

These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and 
add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the 
original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin. 

Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one post to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you 
claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the 
liberals.

4. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your Source

If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is 
right wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts 
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. 
Go back to the facts. 

5. The Limbaugh Defense:

This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea what he says, they will 
drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an attempt to change the 
subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, 
LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED. 

6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

When they find out they are unable to engage you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, they will send out the Bat 
Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number of rapid fire posts 
congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and disciplined of us. 
The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and personal attacks. 
The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at them. 

Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid point (Dutch did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to 
continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial statement of facts that established your victory are for entertainment and educational 
purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to 
find someone else that will engage them on their terms.

Now, go away, Snowflake. 

=====

Alan Baker, The Creepy Internet Stalker!

MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
Feb 13, 2008, 12:19:48AM


to
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.

They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.

Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
people that

stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm

Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian
police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench
tech from Vancouver, BC.


Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus
remove themselves from danger.

Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
Feb 13, 2008, 2:47:35AM


to
In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:

> Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.

Nope. I took about 45 minutes.

>
> They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
> practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.

People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
them sued.


>
> Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver,
> BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
> people that
>
> stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan
> Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
>
> http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm

Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've
bragged about to clear up that tax lien...

Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
home?

>
> Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian
> police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench
> tech from Vancouver, BC.
>
>
> Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus
> remove themselves from danger.


Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
Feb 13, 2008, 2:55:05AM


to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-4A7C3C.00473513022008@...

> In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
>
> Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
>
> >
> > They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
> > practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
>
> People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
> them sued.
> >

Hire a lawyer and sue away. Two people can do research you sick perv.

> > Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from
> > Vancouver,
> > BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
> > people that
> >
> > stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia.
> > Alan
> > Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
> >
> > http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
>
> Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've
> bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
>

www.irs.gov

> Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
> hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
> home?

Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending
day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order against
you.



>
> >
> > Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and
> > Canadian
> > police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh
> > bench
> > tech from Vancouver, BC.
> >
> >
> > Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and
> > thus
> > remove themselves from danger.
>
> 
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
> to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
> sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
Feb 13, 2008, 2:59:07AM


to
In article <BsSdnXHnHooULS_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:

> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-4A7C3C.00473513022008@...
> > In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
> >
> > Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
> >
> > >
> > > They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
> > > practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
> >
> > People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
> > them sued.
> > >
>
> Hire a lawyer and sue away. Two people can do research you sick perv.

LOL

I'm sure 'two people" can. You: no.

>
> > > Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from
> > > Vancouver,
> > > BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
> > > people that
> > >
> > > stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia.
> > > Alan
> > > Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
> > >
> > > http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
> >
> > Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've
> > bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
> >
>
> www.irs.gov

Is that an invitation?

>
>
>
> > Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
> > hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
> > home?
>
> Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to kill
> them on the phone?
> Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending
> day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
> Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order against
> you.

I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you. I've just found
out a few facts.

But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.

:-)


MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
Feb 13, 2008, 3:05:31AM


to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-7E962A.00590613022008@...


I believe that's a website.
I didn't invite you to call my grandparents at all hours of the night that
sure didn't stop you.


> >
> >
> >
> > > Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
> > > hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
> > > home?
> >
> > Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to
> > kill
> > them on the phone?
> > Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending
> > day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
> > Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order
> > against
> > you.
>
> I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you. I've just found
> out a few facts.
>
> But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.

You're not capable of bothering me. However when you bother my elderly
grandparents and get family involved you are crossing the line from online
weirdo, to complete psycho that needs help. You even stated it was fun
earlier finding personal information on people online. If your life really
that void. Perhaps instead of souring website after website trying to verify
if I have this motorcycle or that car, or that house you should get involved
in your own life. This sort of behavior has burned you before and left you
so you are unemployable and must work fixing computers for a living. You
should have learned your lesson the first time.