Davin News Server

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:10:11 -0700,  Alan says...  

On 2024-10-28 05:42, AlleyCat wrote:

Puerto Ricans who attended Trump's Madison Square Garden rally say they had ZERO problem with the joke Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe made on
stage

"Do you guys even give a fuck about that?"

Them: "No, we don't... Puerto Ricans for Trump."

> You mean one or two people claiming to be Puerto Rican said it...
> 
> ...right?

Yes. If THEY had no problem with it, then, it was ONLY the WHITE liberals who did.

https://i.imgur.com/VvPvccO.png

"The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man.?

"Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro."

"So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress..."

"The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling 
himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have."

"If the Negro wasn't taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negroes would get together and solve our own problems."

...(I)n America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white 
liberal was going to solve our problems."

"Our problems will never be solved by the white man."

"The white liberal aren't white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking."

"The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro."

"The Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative."

"Anything the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he's only a pawn in the 
hands of the white liberal."

"The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees 
into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox."

=====

https://i.imgur.com/Kj6pVMM.png

"The White liberal differs from the White Conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. Both want 
power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor.

===============================================================================

The Liberal Argument Outline 

1. Use spun facts:

These can be found on Huffington Post, Daily Kos, MSNBC, and many other liberal sources. What they do is take facts, polls or arguments and 
add a liberal spin in a weak attempt to make bad news for liberals look good. These are easily debunked and exposed as lies by going to the 
original source and posting the hard, cold facts with NO spin. Note: At this point, you have won. It should never take more than one post 
to win an argument with a liberal. It is recommended that you claim victory and disengage at this point. If you continue, for fun or 
experimental purposes, no further logic will be forthcoming from the liberals.

2. The Next Step For The Liberal Will Be To Attempt To Discredit Your Source:

If it is Fox or any perceived "right wing" source, they will refuse to believe it. If it is a non-partisan source, they will claim it is 
right wing, if it is a left of center source, they will find another lefty source to "prove" you are wrong. They will not discuss the facts 
themselves, as they know they have lost. If you must go down this road (there is a high entertainment value), don't allow this diversion. 
Go back to the facts.

3. The Limbaugh Defense:

This is one that comes out early and often. Although you know they never listen to Rush Limbaugh and have no idea 
what he says, they will drag him out and claim you are a Ditto head. This is another diversionary tactic. It has no relevance and is an 
attempt to change the subject. The more desperate they are, the more childish and ridiculous the reference to Limbaugh becomes: Flush, 
LimpBag, etc. Ignore this and re-post the facts. DO NOT BE DIVERTED.

4. The Personal Attack:

Another common thread. Also designed to divert the lost argument. NEVER give any hint of personal information. Even 
something as innocuous as "I am a chef". They will attempt to engage you and call you a liar to divert attention from the original lost 
argument. Ignore this and re-post the facts yet to be refuted.

5. Name Calling:

Still another diversion. If you fail to give them any personal information, they will attempt to draw you out to gain more 
insight into your personal side. Then they will return to step 4. Ignore this.

6. The Liberal Bat Signal:

When they find out they are unable to engage you, divert you or goad you into a completely irrelevant topic, 
they will send out the Bat Signal. This is where a bunch of Liberals (or often, the same one using several names, i.e., Rudy) post a number 
of rapid fire posts congratulating the Liberal on handing you your head on a platter. This tactic often works on even the most logical and 
disciplined of us. The urge to rant must be resisted. Your rant will supply them with all the personal insight they need to spew hatred and 
personal attacks. The best tactic here is to use the same tactic back at them. Keep in mind, a Liberal will never admit you have a valid 
point (Dutch did, once), much less that you won a debate. So, the only reasons to continue a dialog with a liberal after the initial 
statement of facts that established your victory are for entertainment and educational purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand 
the topic remain on the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find someone else that will engage them on their 
terms.

Now, go away, Snowflake.