From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Puerto Ricans who attended Trump's Madison Square Garden rally say...
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 07:57:49 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vfr9pc$1ls1c$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-29 11:11, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vfr7mb$1lhnh$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-28 21:44, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:10:11 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>> On 2024-10-28 05:42, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Puerto Ricans who attended Trump's Madison Square Garden rally say
> >>> they had ZERO problem with the joke Comedian Tony Hinchcliffe made
> >>> on stage
> >>>
> >>> "Do you guys even give a fuck about that?"
> >>>
> >>> Them: "No, we don't... Puerto Ricans for Trump."
> >>
> >> So two guys who claim to be Puerto Rican must actually BE Puerto Rican?
> >>
> >> And even if they are, do they speak for ALL Puerto Ricans?
> >
> > Do you wear a foil hat too?
>
> So you can make claims that juries have been "bought", but I can't point
> out that it's easy to claim you're something you're not?
Huh? Juries can be bought.
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> You mean one or two people claiming to be Puerto Rican said it...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...right?
> >>>
> >>> Yes. If THEY had no problem with it, then, it was ONLY the WHITE
> >>> liberals who did.
> >> Really?
> >>
> >> Are you sure I couldn't find at least a couple of Puerto Ricans that had
> >> a problem with it?
> >
> > Just a couple who claim to be Puerto Ricans?
>
> Suddenly the shoe is on the other foot, is it?
Not mine.
>
> >>
> >> I bet I could.
> >>
> >> And if I find one more than you found, then by your argument, that means
> >> that all Puerto Ricans except your two have a problem with it...
> >>
> >> ...right, Pussey?
> >>
> >> I'll give you one right here:
> >>
> >> 'I call upon you, Mr. Trump, to disavow these comments as reflecting in
> >> any way your personal or political viewpoints.
> >
> >
> > He did, you ignore that.
>
> You reflexively claimed he didn't with no actual knowledge.
He did. I heard him.
>
> >>
> >> Roberto O. González Nieves
> >>
> >> Puerto Rico'
> >
> > How do you know he's really from there?
> Oh, little cultist....
I made you do it again.
>
> You've walked into it again.
To what? You take this to serious.
>
> I didn't quote his entire signature:
>
> 'Roberto O. González Nieves, OFM
> Archbishop of San Juan de Puerto Rico'
>
> You should learn to do a little fact-checking before you type.
Yet you say everything we say is a lie. Why can't that be a lie?
>
> :-)