From: De-Trois-Leaning <dtl@invalid.net>
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair,rec.food.cooking,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,can.politics,aus.politics
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Mars_Has_an_Unexpected_Influence_on_Earth=e2=80=99s?=
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:30:49 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Petzl wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:15:34 -0700, De-Trois-Leaning <dtl@invalid.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Ed P wrote:
>>> What is the reaction of burning 100 million tons of fuel today?
>>
>> Increased albedo leading soon enough to global cooling, rapidly.
>>
>>> What about all the trees cut down?
>>
>> 25% more vegetation exists as a direct complimentary partner to
>> increased C)2 production.
>>
>> In essence the "green" Oxygen balance has improved.
>>
>> https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/co2-is-making-earth-greenerfor-now/
> https://t.ly/R1i03
> snip
> Climate change is a snout and trotters in trough con game!
> The BBC "Yes Prime Minister 2" gives a humorous satire of the truth
> <https://climatecite.com/yes-prime-minister-on-climate-change/>
> https://t.ly/HEP35
> Yes, Prime Minister on Climate Change
> Claire Hello? Itâs the BBC again. I see. Thanks. (She hangs up.)
> Piling on the agony. A big new story about global warming has just
> broken, theyâre adding that to the Sunday programme too. Global
> warming computer models have been proved wrong.
>
> Humphrey How shocking!
> Claire Itâs just that theyâre going to add it to the catalogue of your
> failures. (He gives her a look.) Alleged failures, I mean.
>
> Humphrey Meanwhile, may I suggest that you donât worry too much about
> global warming?
>
> Jim Right. I canât do anything about that tonight, can I?
>
> Humphrey Tell me, how do they know weâre all going to drown in years
> when the weather forecast was so wrong last Friday?
>
> Jim Because all the scientists agree.
>
> Humphrey So they say. So do the computer models. I know. But why
> should global warming computer models be any more accurate than
> financial ones?
>
> Claire Itâs just that theyâre going to add it to the catalogue of your
> failures. (He gives her a look.) Alleged failures, I mean.
>
> Humphrey Meanwhile, may I suggest that you donât worry too much about
> global warming?
>
> Jim Right. I canât do anything about that tonight, can I?
>
> Humphrey Tell me, how do they know weâre all going to drown in years
> when the weather forecast was so wrong last Friday?
>
> Jim Because all the scientists agree.
>
> Humphrey So they say. So do the computer models. I know. But why
> should global warming computer models be any more accurate than
> financial ones?
>
>
<VBG!>
:-)
https://www.sott.net/article/221916-Pole-Shift-North-Races-South-Crawls
https://www.sciencefocus.com/planet-earth/is-antarctica-moving-away-from-the-south-pole
https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/weird-dent-in-earths-magnetic-field-is-messing-with-auroras-in-the-southern-hemisphere
https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/geology/collapse-of-earths-magnetic-field-may-have-fueled-evolution-of-life-600-million-years-ago
https://scienceblog.com/543851/earths-weakening-magnetic-field-could-lead-to-increased-cosmic-radiation/
The Earthâs magnetic field, which protects our planet from harmful
cosmic radiation and charged particles from the sun, is not as stable as
it may seem. According to new research, the fieldâs intensity can
significantly decrease during events called magnetic field excursions,
leaving Earth more vulnerable to space weather.