Davin News Server

From: De-Trois-Leaning <dtl@invalid.net>
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair,rec.food.cooking,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,can.politics,aus.politics
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Mars_Has_an_Unexpected_Influence_on_Earth=e2=80=99s?=
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:30:49 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

Petzl wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:15:34 -0700, De-Trois-Leaning <dtl@invalid.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> Ed P wrote:
>>> What is the reaction of burning 100 million tons of fuel today?
>>
>> Increased albedo leading soon enough to global cooling, rapidly.
>>
>>> What  about all the trees cut down?
>>
>> 25% more vegetation exists as a direct complimentary partner to
>> increased C)2 production.
>>
>> In essence the "green" Oxygen balance has improved.
>>
>> https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/co2-is-making-earth-greenerfor-now/
>      https://t.ly/R1i03
> snip
> Climate change is a snout and trotters in trough con game!
> The BBC "Yes Prime Minister 2" gives a humorous satire of the truth
> <https://climatecite.com/yes-prime-minister-on-climate-change/>
>        https://t.ly/HEP35
> Yes, Prime Minister on Climate Change
> Claire Hello? It’s the BBC again. I see. Thanks. (She hangs up.)
> Piling on the agony. A big new story about global warming has just
> broken, they’re adding that to the Sunday programme too. Global
> warming computer models have been proved wrong.
> 
> Humphrey How shocking!
> Claire It’s just that they’re going to add it to the catalogue of your
> failures. (He gives her a look.) Alleged failures, I mean.
> 
> Humphrey Meanwhile, may I suggest that you don’t worry too much about
> global warming?
> 
> Jim Right. I can’t do anything about that tonight, can I?
> 
> Humphrey Tell me, how do they know we’re all going to drown in years
> when the weather forecast was so wrong last Friday?
> 
> Jim Because all the scientists agree.
> 
> Humphrey So they say. So do the computer models. I know. But why
> should global warming computer models be any more accurate than
> financial ones?
> 
> Claire It’s just that they’re going to add it to the catalogue of your
> failures. (He gives her a look.) Alleged failures, I mean.
> 
> Humphrey Meanwhile, may I suggest that you don’t worry too much about
> global warming?
> 
> Jim Right. I can’t do anything about that tonight, can I?
> 
> Humphrey Tell me, how do they know we’re all going to drown in years
> when the weather forecast was so wrong last Friday?
> 
> Jim Because all the scientists agree.
> 
> Humphrey So they say. So do the computer models. I know. But why
> should global warming computer models be any more accurate than
> financial ones?
> 
> 
<VBG!>

:-)

https://www.sott.net/article/221916-Pole-Shift-North-Races-South-Crawls

https://www.sciencefocus.com/planet-earth/is-antarctica-moving-away-from-the-south-pole

https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/weird-dent-in-earths-magnetic-field-is-messing-with-auroras-in-the-southern-hemisphere

https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/geology/collapse-of-earths-magnetic-field-may-have-fueled-evolution-of-life-600-million-years-ago

https://scienceblog.com/543851/earths-weakening-magnetic-field-could-lead-to-increased-cosmic-radiation/

The Earth’s magnetic field, which protects our planet from harmful 
cosmic radiation and charged particles from the sun, is not as stable as 
it may seem. According to new research, the field’s intensity can 
significantly decrease during events called magnetic field excursions, 
leaving Earth more vulnerable to space weather.