From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Class Warfare, In the News
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 12:28:36 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vivf0t$2g5mo$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-12-06 07:15, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vitahi$1rtrv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-12-05 14:35, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <viso4p$1oa45$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-12-05 08:28, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <viqsa3$16htv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-12-04 09:48, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 17:07:16 +0000, Lee says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Musk, along with Trump crony and
> >>>>>>>> business executive Vivek Ramaswamy,
> >>>>>>>> has been tasked by Trump to run
> >>>>>>>> the figurehead Department of
> >>>>>>>> Government Efficiency, where
> >>>>>>>> their mission will be to eliminate
> >>>>>>>> government waste. It?s no secret
> >>>>>>>> that their vision of waste
> >>>>>>>> includes Social Security, and
> >>>>>>>> they seem to have the backing of
> >>>>>>>> Trump and Vice President?elect
> >>>>>>>> JD Vance.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They're not going to cut benefits, stupid. They're going to cut WASTE. Redundant jobs? Jobs that don't really DO anything.
> >>>>>> There probably aren't as many of those as you think, Pussey?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tell me:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How much larger do you think the federal workforce is today than it was
> >>>>>> say...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...50 years ago?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Population is going up not down idiot.
> >>>>
> >>>> I know that.
> >>>>
> >>>> So how much do you think the federal government's has increased by...
> >>>
> >>> Who cares?
> >> It's pretty relevant if one is examining:
> >>
> >> 'They're going to cut WASTE. Redundant jobs? Jobs that don't really DO
> >> anything.'
> >
> > Good.
>
> You really are this stupid, aren't you?
You mean enough to lead you around on a chain?