From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 09:27:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:09:33 -0700, Skeeter
<skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <vkmkgn$3mqvt$3@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 12/27/2024 7:41 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:36:31 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>> > <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 12/26/2024 6:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:12:47 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>> >>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>> {snip}
>>
>> >>>> What examination would you have her do?
>> >>>
>> >>> Specific ways of verification of methodology I leave to the
>> >>> professions but again, I've answered your question already.
>> >>
>> >> There was no examination for her to do. She was right! And, that's why
>> >> your answer was absurd.
>> >
>> > And you seem to think due dilligence shouldn't be a thing. Her same
>> > methodology FAILED this year. Had she verified how she went about the
>> > previous poll she may have prevented the career ender this poll did.
>>
>> The only thing she would have found was Trump would be +6 with recall
>> weighting. And, she would have noted that had she recall weighted in
>> 2016 and 2020, she would have gotten it wrong.
>>
>> What should she have done next? That's easy: don't use recall weighting
>> and publish the poll as Harris +3.
>
>Notice: Trump won.
Shhhh. Josh still seems to think that Selter's poll was correct....