From: Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 10:21:35 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 1/1/2025 10:11 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> On 1/1/2025 8:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:43:16 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> {snip}
>
>>> So, she should have not published in 2024 after examination and
>>> published in 2016 and 2020 after examination because of this clear party
>>> motivation thing? Laughter, indeed.
>>
>> Good lord, you're dense. You've had your question answered no fewer
>> than three times and you ask it again. Oh and you snipped the
>> following:
>>
>> "It was very clear to anyone paying attention that 2024 was very
>> different for party motivation. Seltzer's failure to check her
>> methodology problem resulted in her career ending. At this point, you
>> are asking hypotheticals of hypotheticals since you are presuming that
>> she checked her methodology when she saw the poll this year was out of
>> bed. My position is she did not and the easiest explanation is
>> usually the correct one. "
>>
>> I never said jack about not publishing the polls yet you keep implying
>> that I'm saying that.
>
> That means you have not answered my questions on whether she should have
> published in 2016, 2020 or 2024 after checking her methodology.
>
> There are two possible assumptions: she did not check her methodology in
> any of 2016, 2020 and 2024. In that case, you think she was wrong in all
> those years not to check. OK, I understand that argument and it is
> reasonable.
And one more thing: assuming she did not check. Publish or not publish?
You didn't answer that one either.
> But, it doesn't end the discussion. Let's assume she did the right thing
> and checked. What then? Publish or not publish? You refuse to answer.