From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 07:02:11 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 10:21:35 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>On 1/1/2025 10:11 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>> On 1/1/2025 8:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:43:16 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>> {snip}
>>
>>>> So, she should have not published in 2024 after examination and
>>>> published in 2016 and 2020 after examination because of this clear party
>>>> motivation thing? Laughter, indeed.
>>>
>>> Good lord, you're dense. You've had your question answered no fewer
>>> than three times and you ask it again. Oh and you snipped the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> "It was very clear to anyone paying attention that 2024 was very
>>> different for party motivation. Seltzer's failure to check her
>>> methodology problem resulted in her career ending. At this point, you
>>> are asking hypotheticals of hypotheticals since you are presuming that
>>> she checked her methodology when she saw the poll this year was out of
>>> bed. My position is she did not and the easiest explanation is
>>> usually the correct one. "
>>>
>>> I never said jack about not publishing the polls yet you keep implying
>>> that I'm saying that.
>>
>> That means you have not answered my questions on whether she should have
>> published in 2016, 2020 or 2024 after checking her methodology.
>>
>> There are two possible assumptions: she did not check her methodology in
>> any of 2016, 2020 and 2024. In that case, you think she was wrong in all
>> those years not to check. OK, I understand that argument and it is
>> reasonable.
>
>And one more thing: assuming she did not check. Publish or not publish?
>You didn't answer that one either.
Laughter.
>
>> But, it doesn't end the discussion. Let's assume she did the right thing
>> and checked. What then? Publish or not publish? You refuse to answer.
Why did you post to reask the question you literally just posted?