From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 06:51:24 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:00:50 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>On 1/2/2025 3:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 10:11:48 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/1/2025 8:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 07:43:16 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
>>>> <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> {snip}
>>>
>>>>> So, she should have not published in 2024 after examination and
>>>>> published in 2016 and 2020 after examination because of this clear party
>>>>> motivation thing? Laughter, indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Good lord, you're dense. You've had your question answered no fewer
>>>> than three times and you ask it again. Oh and you snipped the
>>>> following:
>>>>
>>>> "It was very clear to anyone paying attention that 2024 was very
>>>> different for party motivation. Seltzer's failure to check her
>>>> methodology problem resulted in her career ending. At this point, you
>>>> are asking hypotheticals of hypotheticals since you are presuming that
>>>> she checked her methodology when she saw the poll this year was out of
>>>> bed. My position is she did not and the easiest explanation is
>>>> usually the correct one. "
>>>>
>>>> I never said jack about not publishing the polls yet you keep implying
>>>> that I'm saying that.
>>>
>>> That means you have not answered my questions on whether she should have
>>> published in 2016, 2020 or 2024 after checking her methodology.
>>
>> Laughter.
>> Already answered no fewer than three times.
>
>Bullshit. You can't have answered it because you admited that you never
>said jack about it.
Now you're flat out lying about what I said. My words:
"I never said jack about not publishing the polls"
I did, however state extremely clearly about what she SHOULD have done
when she noticed her 2024 was out of bed.
You've become a simple troll - and ot a good one.
>
>> Your inability to comprehend responses doesn't mean they don't exit.
>>
>> <eyeroll>
<crickets.wav>
>>
>>>
>>> There are two possible assumptions: she did not check her methodology in
>>> any of 2016, 2020 and 2024. In that case, you think she was wrong in all
>>> those years not to check. OK, I understand that argument and it is
>>> reasonable.
>>>
>>
>> This has been addressed as well.
<crickets.wav>
>>
>>> But, it doesn't end the discussion. Let's assume she did the right thing
>>> and checked. What then? Publish or not publish? You refuse to answer.
>>
>> And this was addressed as wel.
<crickets.wav>