From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 09:37:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 08:07:42 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>On 1/4/2025 6:23 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 07:45:56 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/3/2025 3:51 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:00:50 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> I never said jack about not publishing the polls yet you keep implying
>>>>>>>> that I'm saying that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means you have not answered my questions on whether she should have
>>>>>>> published in 2016, 2020 or 2024 after checking her methodology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laughter.
>>>>>> Already answered no fewer than three times.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit. You can't have answered it because you admited that you never
>>>>> said jack about it.
>>>>
>>>> Now you're flat out lying about what I said. My words:
>>>>
>>>> "I never said jack about not publishing the polls"
>>>
>>> Precisely. Which means you did not answer the questions on whether she
>>> should have published in 2016, 2020 and 2024.
>>
>> Laughter.
>>
>> Actually I did. I said exactly what she should have done before
>> publishing the polls
>
>Right, examine them to see why they are outliers. So, assuming she did
>not examine them in 2016, 2020 and 2024, you believe she should not have
>published.
HUh? I didn't say it.
That's more of your reading comprehension problems.
Yeah she publsihed... and lost her job as a result. Your bizarre line
of questioning doesn't change that.
Lack of professionalism has its consequences.
>
>> and it did not include not publishing them.
>
>Nor did it include publishing them. Which means you did not answer the
>question of whether she should have published in 2016, 2020 and 2024
>assuming she examined them.
Laughter.
I'm sorry but your inability to read the typed word does not mean that
I have to cater to your silliness.