From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Trump Sues Newspaper Over Election Interference
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 06:59:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 07:01:26 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:00:07 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On 1/6/2025 4:08 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:44:07 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/5/2025 6:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 08:07:42 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually I did. I said exactly what she should have done before
>>>>>>> publishing the polls
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right, examine them to see why they are outliers. So, assuming she did
>>>>>> not examine them in 2016, 2020 and 2024, you believe she should not have
>>>>>> published.
>>>>>
>>>>> HUh? I didn't say it.
>>>>
>>>> You just did: "I said exactly what she should have done before
>>>> publishing the polls."
>>>
>>> OMG. Are you drinking with Siri?
>>>
>>> Are you claiming that an "expert" pollster can't check her work before
>>> publishing a poll?
>>>
>
>Silence.
>
>>>>
>>>> That "exactly what she should have done" was examine them to see why
>>>> they are outliers.
>>>>
>>>> A = examine
>>>> B = publish
>>>>
>>>> "She should have examined them before publishing" is "Do A before B"
>>>> "Do A before B" is the logical equivalent of "IF not A then not B"
>>>
>>> Hey if she chose to publsih without looking for the obvious problem
>>> that was her call. I never said she shouldn't have go that route nor
>>> did I say she shouldn't have published.
>>
>>Cut the shit. "I said exactly what she should have done before
>>publishing the polls."
>
>Good grief. I even explained it again and you still don't get it.
>
>A and B are not mutually exclusive. You even ignored the question
>above. You are either deliberately obtuse or you are suffering from
>such a case of TDS that you are completely irrational.
>
>In either case...
>
>Laughter.
>
>Take a moment, take it all in, process it and get logical before you
>respond please.
And after weeks of trolling around, "Josh" has vanished.
How the mighty have fallen.