From: Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Reading 1358-2 (archive)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:44:18 -0800
Organization: Pseudochaotic
Alan wrote:
> On 2025-01-08 15:08, JTEM wrote:
>> Â Â Alan wrote:
>>
>>> You're once again imagining that reality is decide by polls.
>>
>> Odd you should say this when you know for a fact that windmills
>> create a lot of noise, and one of the problems whales face is
>> noise, yet conclude that windmills have no ill effects on
>> whales.
> Can you produce any authoritative source that cites this as an issue?
Some of it can. Navy sonar is known to hurt whales, so USN avoids
sonar around whales if it can. The measured sound of ship
propellers is known to match to long range whale song reducing
clarity of whales, but nothing is done because we have no cheap
alternative.
Coastal windfarms are located in many parts of worlds. No one has
produced any correlation between windmills and dead whales.
New Jersey? Maybe Snooki escaped captivity and made it to the
seashore.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed