Davin News Server

On 2025-01-09 16:00, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vlpkia$3j1gc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2025-01-09 14:56, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vlp7lf$3gfj7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-09 05:34, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 16:47, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vlmcoi$2sp2o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 09:27, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmaia$2sa75$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 05:53, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay the standard penalty before release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you agree no crimes were committed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> punishment match the "crimes"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
>>>>>>>>>>>> given due process are a different situation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
>>>>>>>>>>> around outside"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't buy into anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Extraordinary claims require support.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something you never provide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, just to shut the libbys upone more time:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q?si=MvTgeMACRZNS-Cy8>
>>>>>> You should read before you post...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...assuming you know HOW to read:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
>>>>>> Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
>>>>>> Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
>>>>>
>>>>> Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
>>>>> the left wing media station is feeding you.
>>>>
>>>> If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
>>>> guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
>>>>
>>>>> Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
>>>>> The idea is to save one's skin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
>>>>> was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
>>>>> for whatever reason.
>>>>
>>>> Show it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
>>>>
>>>> She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
>>>> and was told multiple times to get back.
>>>>
>>>>> He got a promotion for his "work".
>>>> As your kind likes to say when innocent black people get shot:
>>>>
>>>> "She should have complied".
>>>
>>> She was murdered.
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
>> window, you'd say the killing was justified.
> 
> Nope. I saw the footage.

Great!

Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.