Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Pardon Every Last One of Them
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 04:26:15 -0700
Organization: UTB

In article <vlso0f$f2dr$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-10 19:18, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vlsiib$a24b$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-10 17:43, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vls978$949p$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-10 14:52, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vls63e$8671$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-10 13:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vls4e5$8672$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 03:57, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vlq30r$3p6o6$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlpkfj$3j1gc$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 14:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlp99s$3gfij$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 11:44, Pierre Delecto wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2025 1:26 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Delecto <romneysrhinoblaster@delecto.com> wrote in news:vlonlo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $3cf82$1@dont-email.me:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2025 9:24 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vloj9r$3cfkd$2@dont-email.me:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 16:47, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmcoi$2sp2o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 09:27, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmaia$2sa75$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 05:53, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they should pay the standard penalty before release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you agree no crimes were committed?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did the punishment match the "crimes"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and who were given due process are a different situation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wandering around outside"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't buy into anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Extraordinary claims require support.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you never provide.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, just to shut the libbys upone more time:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q?si=MvTgeMACRZNS-Cy8>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should read before you post...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...assuming you know HOW to read:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacob Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the spin the left wing media station is feeding you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side of the story. The idea is to save one's skin.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hide that was released AFTER that particular one and there is no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doubt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the police stood down for whatever reason.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He got a promotion for his "work".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump Says Jan. 6 Was an Insurrection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FEBRUARY 8, 2024
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/49af2nzt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fox News calls it an insurrection:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senate holds hearing on Capitol insurrection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feb 23
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/wa8d5hh3
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mich McConnell calls it an insurrection:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "This failed insurrection only underscores
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how crucial the task before us is for our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> republic."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mitch McConnell, Jan. 6, 2021
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/35cxm3zv
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suddenly, and conveniently, you now beleive Trump, Fox and McConnell.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            And suddenly you realize that Trump LIES.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then Trump must have lied when he said said Jan. 6 was an insurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "statement against interest": look it up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            Why did you vote for such a brazen liar?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because Harris was/is that bad.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse than a convicted felon who stole classified documents?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Joe did? Trump didn't "steal" anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, he really did.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> They recovered hundreds and hundreds of classified documents that he
> >>>>>>>>>>>> DELIBERATELY took.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> No, no theft at all. The issue was he refused to return some.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And that makes it better...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...even assuming that's so...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...how, exactly?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> He stole nothing. That's the point.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He deliberately took things that didn't belong to him.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That is the literal definition of stealing:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> steal | stel |
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> verb (past stole | stol |; past participle stolen | 'stol?n |)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1 [with object] take (another person's property) without permission or
> >>>>>>>> legal right and without intending to return it:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So did Biden. What's your point? How come Trump didn't get charged with
> >>>>>>> anything?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "intending".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If I accidentally pick up the wrong phone and go home with it, that's
> >>>>>> not stealing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No charges, nothing. Stop digging empty holes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There were charges.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is a fact, doofus.
> >>>
> >>> Yet nothing happened and he gets to have the documents back  BWAAHAHAHA
> >>
> >> But you agree that there were charges, right?
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> A grand jury was empanelled and returned indictments:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf>
> >>>
> >>> and it's dead in the water.
> >>>
> >>> Moving along to now.
> >> You mean you're running away now.
> > 
> > That don't mean shit if he wasn't convicted. There were no theft
> > charges.
> 
> Keep sliding those goalposts!

Nothing happened. No charges and he gets the documents back.