Davin News Server

In article <vlv3lf$rdh9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-11 03:26, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vlsp95$f2dr$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-10 19:19, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vlsikg$a24b$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-10 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vls99q$949p$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-10 14:55, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vls66n$8671$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 13:51, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vls341$7v2g$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 13:15, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlrjpi$55to$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-10 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlq32k$3p6o6$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 16:00, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlpkia$3j1gc$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 14:56, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlp7lf$3gfj7$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09 05:34, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 16:47, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmcoi$2sp2o$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 09:27, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vlmaia$2sa75$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08 05:53, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-08, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:49:56 -0800, Siri Cruise
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone committed a serious crime of actual violence, they should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay the standard penalty before release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you agree no crimes were committed?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were the "crimes" worthy of the manhunt for these people and did the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> punishment match the "crimes"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the vast majority of the people convicted, no way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some were simply wandering around outside the capitol building.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Others were let in by police and escorted around the building.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who committed acts of violence, destruction of property and who were
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given due process are a different situation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give an example of someone who was convicted "simply for wandering
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around outside"?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And no rioters were "let in and escorted around the building".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy in to these bullshit narratives?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you buy into the lies? Were you there?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't buy into anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Extraordinary claims require support.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something you never provide.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't waste my time with these libby Nimrods and their demands.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, just to shut the libbys upone more time:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/MGjRn0TWE0Q?si=MvTgeMACRZNS-Cy8>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should read before you post...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...assuming you know HOW to read:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Available evidence rebuts Fox News host Tucker Carlson's claim that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitol Police officers acted as "tour guides" for "QAnon Shaman" Jacob
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chansley during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try watching the video and judge for yourself instead of lapping up the spin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the left wing media station is feeding you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you think there is a video that shows the police acting as "tour
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guides", then provide a link AND a time index.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course his plea agreement says things to boost the prosecutor's side of the story.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to save one's skin.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway there are many more hours of video that the committee tried to hide that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was released AFTER that particular one and there is no doubt that the police stood down
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for whatever reason.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, except that officer who murdered Ashley Babbitt.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was going through the last door to where legislators were sheltering
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and was told multiple times to get back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He got a promotion for his "work".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As your kind likes to say when innocent black people get shot:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "She should have complied".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She was murdered.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this were any other person on any other day, breaking in through a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> window, you'd say the killing was justified.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I saw the footage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you can point me to a video and a timecode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw what I saw. There were big bad looking men right next to her but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they chose to murder her.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> She was the one trying to come through the window...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...and "someone else looked like they MIGHT be scarier" isn't much of an
> >>>>>>>>>>>> argument.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You didn't see the real video. She was murdered.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So show it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I already told you, once you started snipping my posts I will not do any
> >>>>>>>>> work for you.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's your work to do.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nope. You command nothing from me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What I've seen is that the rioters were breaking out the windows in the
> >>>>>>>>>> doors to the "Speakers Lobby"...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> A lot of people entered in a lot of places. She was murdered.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...where there were legislators sheltering...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This video shows it:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/01/08/ashli-babbitt-shooting-video-capitol/>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yea? I was right. She was murdered.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...and Babbitt shot in the act of climbing through one of the broken out
> >>>>>>>>>> window.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> She was murdered. No reason to shoot her. She was not a threat. How come
> >>>>>>>>> no one else got shot?
> >>>>>>>> No one else tried to come through the window.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There were people right next to her. She was unarmed. If an unarmed
> >>>>>>> crook get shot they call him a victim. Typical liberal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Except for the unarmed black men...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Who were they? Are they in the video?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Again: if this was a black man coming through the window of someone's
> >>>>>>>> store, you'd call it self-defense.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> She wasn't trying to break into a store you goofy fuck.
> >>>>>> So if it had been a store, shooting here would have been justified?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I didn't say that you moron. I never justified anything. But you sure
> >>>>> brought it up.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's why I'm ASKING you.
> >>>
> >>> You tried to spin it around and put race into it.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Protection of property is justification for shooting, but protection of
> >>>>>> persons is not?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What the hell are you even trying to say? What property? What persons?
> >>>>> What black people? She was murdered.
> >>>> She was breaking into an area where law enforcement was protecting people.
> >>>
> >>> Bullshit. They let them in.
> >>
> >> They weren't letting them in to the "Speaker Lobby".
> >>
> >> The doors were barricaded and the mob was breaking the windows to get
> >> through.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> If she hadn't tried to climb through the window, she wouldn't have been
> >>>> shot.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Why just her?
> >>
> >> She was the one climbing through.
> >>
> >>>
> > 
> > Unarmed.
> 
> So?
> 
> That's never bothered you before.

Who have I shot stupid?