From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-01-12 22:48, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
>
>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
>> levels, do you?
>
> Better than empty fire hydrants.
The reservoirs aren't empty.
But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
water pressure.
>
>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
>
> Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
> CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
> long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
> of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
>
> Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
<https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
>
> California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
> budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
Not germane to this discussion.
>
>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
>
> If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
> California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
> taboo for YOU to care about it?
You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
record-setting amount of rainfall.