From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:54:41 -0600
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:45:03 -0800, Alan says...
> > Better than empty fire hydrants.
>
> The reservoirs aren't empty.
But the hydrants were.
> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> water pressure.
Non-sequitur.
If they had planned for the future, this wouldn't have happened.
=====
California Missing Out On Billions Of Gallons Of Stormwater - Los Angeles Times
https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-03-01/california-missing-out-on-billions-of-gallons-of-stormwater
Mar 1, 2024 - California is letting billions of gallons of stormwater wash out to sea each year.
For too long, California and other states have viewed stormwater as either a threat or an inconvenience - something to be whisked away from cities
and communities as quickly as possible. But as traditional sources of water face worsening strain from population growth, agriculture and other
factors, those unused gallons of rainwater pouring across asphalt or down rain gutters are starting to be viewed as an untapped resource that can
help close the widening gap between supply and demand. (unfounded political shit snipped)
=====
What about the New York Times, faggot?
In a Drought, California Is Watching Water Wash Out to Sea
Heavy storms have flooded parts of California, but the state has been unable to capture billions of gallons of water that are flowing unchecked into
the ocean. Los Angeles is embarking on an ambitious new program to change that.
Liberals don't plan ahead. They're instant gratification animals.
=====
Could building water reservoirs have the scope of a high speed rail system AND cost as much of something that they do NOT need, which is going to
cost Californians $135 BILLION?
So WHAT if it costs more? Scrap the doomed-to-fail bullshit high speed rail system and use THAT money to save life, limb, property AND
infrastructure.
High speed rail vs. life-saving water supply?
I vote life and property-saving.
Talk about scope and waste!
Do you think they CARE if they spend a few billion more, after KNOWING the shit THEY waste money on?
Hell, no. They'll just jack up the taxes a mil or two more and call it a session.
You think they give a shit if they spend GOOD money on a GOOD project, that would have potentially saved lives and property? You tell a liberal about
ANYTHING doing THAT, and they'll vote it in, money be damned.
What about the WASTE of money they've ALREADY committed to?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=california+wastes+billions+on&ia=web
=====
Trump WINS!
Donald Trump is the 47th U.S. president, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Republican Donald Trump was elected President of the United States in the 2024 election, defeating Vice President Kamala Harris.
Trump, 78, will begin his second term early next year.
Donald Trump will be inaugurated as the U.S. President on Monday, January 20, 2025, on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.
A Second Trump Administration