From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat Queers Failed To Have Enough Water To Fight Fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 07:47:20 -0700
Organization: UTB
In article <vm2g9v$1moco$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2025-01-12 22:48, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:18:48 -0800, Alan says...
> >
> >> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record"
> >> levels, do you?
> >
> > Better than empty fire hydrants.
>
> The reservoirs aren't empty.
>
> But needing to use that many fire hydrants simultaneously results in low
> water pressure.
They were empty.
>
> >
> >> How would that be fiscally responsible?
> >
> > Hey faggot, this ain't fucking Canada we're talking about... this is
> > CALIFORNIA, the land of the I don't GIVE a shit what it costs, as
> > long as there are dykes, fags, drag queens and MEXICANS in positions
> > of power and making money and living comfortably off our dime!
> >
> > Yes, OUR dime... they take in FEDERAL dollars too.
>
> You mean like the "FEDERAL dollars" a lot of the Republicans voted
> against Forest Management Wildfire Prevention?
>
> <https://meidasnews.com/news/44-republicans-voted-against-forest-management-wildfire-prevention-in-december>
>
> >
> > California's in debt to the tune of $621 BILLION. How much over-
> > budget do you think the high speed rail system will go? (see below)
>
> Not germane to this discussion.
It shows how incompatant they are.
>
> >
> >> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
> >
> > If the LIBERAL Los Angeles Times can write about it, and say that
> > California is WASTING precious resources... why is it such fucking
> > taboo for YOU to care about it?
> You can't just magically build the infrastructure to handle a
> record-setting amount of rainfall.
Yes you can. Maybe Kanada needs to learn from us.