Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LA Democrat queers failed to have enough water to fight fires
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:43:25 -0700
Organization: UTB

In article <vm3r0v$20lk2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2025-01-13 10:50, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vm3gg5$1s95n$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-01-13 06:44, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vm1mja$1fl7u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-01-12 15:59, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vm1eql$1ecr8$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-01-12 13:31, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vm1129$17hdr$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-01-11 18:56, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:22:38 -0500,  kensi says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, global warming *did* make the fires much worse than they
> >>>>>>>>>> would have been without it:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Uhhh... no.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> California's Record Rainfall Wasted Because Storage Infrastructure Was Never Built
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://climatechangedispatch.com/californias-record-rainfall-wasted-because-storage-infrastructure-was-never-built/
> >>>>>>>> You think you should build infrastructure to deal with "record" levels,
> >>>>>>>> do you?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> How would that be fiscally responsible?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They already are "fiscally irresponsible"
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Do you even realize the scope of what you're suggesting?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you? They fucked up. No water.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> False.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes even they admit it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Show the quote.
> >>>
> >>> Go find it.
> >>
> >> So you can't show it.
> >>
> >> Got it.
> > 
> > Already been explained. Go find it yourself. Google may or may not be
> > your friend.
> 
> You're lying.
> 
> And rather than show me that that statement is wrong, you're going to go 
> right on lying.

They admitted it. You know this.